The Brutalist Is a Three-and-a-Half-Hour Dare — And It Earns Every Single Minute
Brady Corbet's The Brutalist is a sprawling, uncompromising epic about ambition, immigration, and architecture. Our full review breaks down why it demands your attention.
Omid Darvishi
Loading... · 6 min read
A Film That Grabs You and Refuses to Let Go
There's a moment about ninety minutes into <em>The Brutalist</em> where László Tóth, played by Adrien Brody with the kind of quiet fury that burrows under your skin, stands in front of a half-finished building and says absolutely nothing. The camera holds. The Pennsylvania wind moves through the scaffolding. You can hear the creak of raw concrete settling into its frame.
And I realized I hadn't blinked in what felt like a full minute.
That's the kind of film Brady Corbet has made here. Not an easy one. Not a comfortable one. But one that grabs you by the collar in its opening shot and doesn't let go until the credits roll three and a half hours later — and even then, you'll sit in your seat for a while, trying to figure out what just happened to you.
A Story That Spans Decades Without Losing Its Nerve
<em>The Brutalist</em> follows Tóth, a Hungarian-Jewish architect who survives the Holocaust and emigrates to America in 1947 with nothing but a suitcase and a drafting pencil. He lands in Philadelphia, sleeps in a church basement, and scrapes together work renovating a library for a wealthy industrialist named Harrison Lee Van Buren, played by Guy Pearce at his most magnetic and menacing.
Van Buren recognizes Tóth's genius. He also recognizes an opportunity to own it.
What unfolds is not a simple patron-artist story. Corbet is too restless for that. The film charts thirty years of creative ambition colliding with American capitalism, European trauma, and the brutal question of what it costs to build something permanent in a country that treats people as disposable. The central architectural project — a sprawling community center that becomes Tóth's obsession — works as both a literal structure and a metaphor that never feels heavy-handed. That's harder to pull off than it sounds.
Brody Delivers a Career-Defining Performance
I've admired Adrien Brody for years without always loving the films he chooses. Here, he's operating at a level I haven't seen from him since <em>The Pianist</em>. Maybe beyond it.
What struck me was how physical the performance is. Brody doesn't just act exhaustion or desperation — he wears it. His posture changes across decades. His hands move differently when he's drafting versus when he's arguing. There's a scene in the second act, a confrontation with Van Buren over a design change, where Brody communicates more with his jaw than most actors manage with a full monologue.
Felicity Jones, as Tóth's wife Erzsébet, matches him beat for beat. She's given less screen time but arguably the harder role — a woman whose own ambitions and trauma get systematically sidelined by her husband's mission. Jones plays her without a trace of victimhood. Erzsébet is furious, strategic, loving, and exhausted, sometimes all within the same scene.
Corbet's Direction Is Relentless — In the Best Way
Brady Corbet shoots this film like he's building a cathedral. Every frame is composed with architectural precision, which sounds like a cliché given the subject matter, but it's genuinely the right word. The 70mm VistaVision photography by Lol Crawley gives the American landscapes a grandeur that feels earned rather than decorative. Pennsylvania steelworks, mid-century office buildings, marble quarries in Italy — each location is shot as though the camera itself is trying to understand the weight of the materials.
The pacing will test some viewers. I won't pretend otherwise. The first act moves deliberately, laying foundation — quite literally — and there's an intermission built into the theatrical presentation that some audiences may find jarring. But in my view, the length is the point. Corbet wants you to feel the passage of time the way Tóth does: as something that both builds and erodes.
Pros and Cons
<strong>What Hits:</strong> Adrien Brody's best work in over two decades — physically and emotionally transformative. Cinematography that makes architecture feel like a living, breathing character. A script that trusts the audience to sit with ambiguity and moral complexity. Guy Pearce is genuinely unsettling without ever tipping into caricature.
<strong>Pressure Points:</strong> The 215-minute runtime is a real commitment, and the first act's pacing may lose impatient viewers. A third-act narrative choice feels slightly rushed compared to the patience of everything before it. Felicity Jones deserves more screen time than the structure allows.
Final Verdict
<em>The Brutalist</em> is not a film you casually recommend. It asks too much for that — too much time, too much attention, too much emotional investment. But for anyone willing to meet it on its own terms, this is the kind of filmmaking that reminds you why the medium exists in the first place.
Corbet has made something genuinely monumental. Brody has delivered a performance that will be studied for years. And the film's central question — what happens when an artist's vision becomes inseparable from the systems that exploit him — has never felt more urgent.
<strong>FilmeFarsi Score: 9.1 / 10 — Must Watch</strong>
Most viewed today
Features · 6 min
The Brutalist Is a Three-and-a-Half-Hour Dare — And It Earns Every Single Minute
02News · 7 min
The mid-budget theatrical film is quietly winning 2026
News · 3 min
Christopher Nolan Taps Matt Damon and Zendaya for His Most Secretive Project Yet
04News · 6 min
